Video evidence is often more reliable and objective than witness testimony in determining the truth about disputed conduct. Videos provide factual and accurate records of events without subjective biases or faulty memories. They offer a neutral perspective and multiple viewpoints, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding. Videos can be replayed and analyzed numerous times, preserving evidence and ensuring informed conclusions. However, video evidence should be critically evaluated for quality, authenticity, and potential manipulation. Witness testimonies can still provide valuable additional information or context. Ultimately, a combination of both may be the best approach.
0
0